Orthodox-Reformed Bridge

A Meeting Place for Evangelicals, Reformed, and Orthodox Christians

Page 57 of 93

The Grammar of Prayer

 

5096754304_842a0f3f92_nFor many Evangelicals prayer is talking to God with the phrase “In Jesus’ Name.  Amen.” added at the end.  The emphasis is on praying sincerely from the heart.  Little thought is given as to what makes for good mature Christian prayer.  

In this blog posting I want to discuss how Christian prayer is fundamentally Trinitarian in structure, and how inculcating a Trinitarian approach to prayer will deepen and strengthen our prayer life.  Christian prayer is something more than the generally unstructured approach taken by many Evangelicals.  How we understand God, especially God as Trinity, will have a profound effect on our spirituality.

 

What Is Christian Prayer?

For a brief period of time when I was an Evangelical I was attracted to the reverence and structure of the Episcopalian church.  I found in its Book of Common Prayer (BCP) an eloquence and a theological sophistication that seemed absent in much of Evangelicalism.  In the Catechism is a section “Prayer and Worship” which starts out:

Q. What is prayer?

A. Prayer is responding to God, by thought and by deeds, with or without words.

Q. What is Christian Prayer?

A. Christian prayer is response to God the Father, through Jesus Christ, in the power of the Holy Spirit.

I found here the link between our prayer life and God as Trinity.  How we understand the Trinity influences the way we pray, and the way we pray affects our understanding of the Trinity.  I had stumbled on the ancient principle of lex orandi, lex credendi: the rule of prayer is the rule of faith.  This discovery would in time help me transition from modern Evangelicalism to historic Christianity.  While I did find much to appreciate in the Episcopal Church, I was taken aback by the strong influence of liberal theology among the clergy.  So, I never gave the Anglican option serious thought.

This Trinitarian approach to prayer is grounded in Scripture.  In John 14:6 Jesus declared that he was the way to the Father; and in Romans 8:26-27 Paul taught that on our own we are incapable of praying but are able to pray because of the Holy Spirit’s intercession in us.  Paul’s understanding of the Trinitarian structure of Christian prayer can be found in Ephesians 2:18: “For through him (Christ) we both have access to the Father by one Spirit.” (NIV; emphasis added)

 

Grammatically Incorrect Prayers

The discovery of the Trinitarian approach to prayer made me more alert and sensitive to the way people prayed.  I soon became painfully aware how careless or inattentive Evangelicals were when they prayed.  I heard prayers that were either nonsensical or heretical.  These were not intentional heresies but the result of sloppy theology.  What alarmed me though was the general indifference when I brought these errors to the attention of the leadership of my former home church.

My former home church celebrated the Lord’s Supper on the first Sunday of each month.  The elders of the church would go up and sit behind the communion table.  Then one elder would pray over the bread and another would pray over the grape juice.  I remember one Sunday morning, the elder open with: “Dear Heavenly Father. . . .” then proceed to express his gratitude for God’s grace and love.  This was all fine then I heard him give thanks for God dying on the Cross for our sins.  When I heard that I knew what he had in mind, that he wanted to thank God for sending his Son to die for us.  But due to his not distinguishing the persons of the Trinity he ended up inadvertently teaching the heresy of patripassianism: that God the Father suffered on the Cross.

At another Lord’s Supper celebration, I listened to the associate pastor, who graduated from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, a leading Reformed seminary, committing a blooper while leading the congregation in prayer.  He opened praying to Jesus Christ, recounted how Jesus died on the Cross for our sins, and closed with: “In your Name.   Amen.”  Grammatically, this was nonsensical because we pray to the Father through the Son.  To pray to Jesus in Jesus’ name makes no sense.  I brought it to the pastor who disregarded it as a trivial matter.

Then on another occasion I was praying with an Evangelical friend who was a seminarian at Fuller Theological Seminary.  He opened with: “Dear Lord. . . .”, presented his prayer requests, then closed with: “In your name we pray. Amen.”  Afterwards, I asked him which Person of the Trinity he was addressing the prayer to and all I got was an embarrassed shrug.  Upon further reflection I realized that theologically this prayer was fundamentally Unitarian.  Not that my friend was Unitarian, but his prayer was one that a Unitarian could easily have prayed.

The absence of a grammar of prayer became evident when I took part in a discussion with fellow seminarians at Gordon-Conwell.  We talked about which person of the Trinity we preferred to address our personal prayers.  High church Christians prefer to address their prayers to God the Father, Evangelicals prefer to pray to God the Son, Jesus Christ; and the charismatics like to pray to the Holy Spirit as well to Christ.  The bottom line was that all three persons of the Trinity were divine and so it really didn’t matter whom we prayed to.  During all this that line about prayer in the Book of Common Prayer stuck in my mind and made me realize that there was indeed a distinctly Christian approach to prayer.  It made me call into question the soundness of Evangelical theology, especially if this theology exerted so little influence on the way Evangelical prayed to God.

 

Why We Pray In Jesus’ Name

pantocrator-palermo1To pray “in Jesus’ Name” means that you are praying as He would pray.  This means that you know what Jesus wants and that your desires are in line with His.  Jesus’ Name is not a credit card that we can swipe to get what we want.  That is why the Lord’s Prayer is so important for learning how to pray.

We learn from it that we are to seek the sanctification of the Father’s Name.  This is a very Jewish notion of prayer.  Further, we learn that we are to seek the kingdom of God here on earth—another very Jewish notion.

Christians pray in Jesus’ name because he is our great high priest (Hebrews 4:14-16) and because he is the only mediator between man and God (I Timothy 2:5).  Many people think that because God is omnipresent and omniscient, he will hear everyone’s prayers no matter what.  The weakness of this reasoning is that it separates God’s Being from his Person.  Prayer is basically a person to person encounter.  Also, it fails to take into account the Incarnation.  In the Incarnation God the Father revealed himself specifically through His Son who took on human flesh (John 1:14; see also Matthew 11:27).  Furthermore, by his death on the Cross Christ reconciled us to the Father restoring the possibility of communication with God (Hebrews 10:19-22).  If we are alienated from God, not living in harmony with God’s will, prayer becomes an impossibility.  Only if we turn back to God and seek to do God’s will is prayer possible.  This is where faith in Jesus Christ is so crucial.  God the Father sent his Son so that we could enter into relationship with him.  This is the foundational basis for Christian prayer.

Christian prayer assumes our being baptized into Christ.  As a result of the sacrament of baptism we are no longer autonomous beings alienated from God; we are now in Christ, reconciled to the Father.  This is because in baptism we are baptized into Christ’s death and his resurrection (Romans 8:3-11).  By means of covenantal adoption we are now children of God.  When one becomes a Christian, Christ’s name becomes our name as well.  An awesome responsibility is given to us.  In the biblical worldview the name was identical with the person.  So when you pray in Jesus’ name it means you are asking for what he wants.  Thus, a certain responsibility comes with the authority to use Jesus’ name.

To be entrusted with another person’s name is an awesome responsibility even in the secular world.  When I worked at the Hawaii legislature I would go down to the supply shop and sign out for whatever office supplies were needed.  I was able to do so because of the authority of my boss.  I ordered office supplies “in Senator Norman Sakamoto’s name.”  I used this power judiciously.  One, because to act irresponsibly would bring shame on my employer’s name and that of his office.  Two, because to act irresponsibly would result in my access to the supply shop being cut off.  This experience helped me to understand John 14:13-14 where Jesus taught:

And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Son may bring glory to the Father.  You may ask me for anything in my name and I will do it. (OSB)

Similarly, as Christians grow in maturity they come to know the mind of Christ and the more their thinking take on the kingdom perspective the more they are able to pray effectively in Jesus’ name.

 

Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi

The lack of structured prayers in Evangelicalism meant that when we prayed corporately the prayers offered quite often reflected the personal situation or the spiritual maturity of the person giving the prayer.  This is both the strength and the weakness of Evangelicalism’s emphasis on personal prayer.  It ends up as individualized prayer rather than the prayer of the community.

This desire for a more structured approach to prayer drew me to liturgical worship.  There is structure in Evangelical and Protestant worship, but there seems to be a disconnect between the doctrine of the Trinity and the way they prayed.  The Trinity was rarely invoked during Protestant worship except on solemn or formal occasions.  But when I visited Episcopalian and Roman Catholic liturgies I was struck by how much more prominent the Trinity was in their prayers.  Furthermore, the fixed prayers in these liturgical churches provided a balance and maturity that I usually did not sense at Evangelical or charismatic gatherings.

 

prayer-incense-iconBut it was in the Liturgy celebrated by the Orthodox Church that my understanding of Christian worship underwent a paradigm shift.  Where before I saw worship as an expression of what was inside me, I began to see the Liturgy as reshaping my spirituality, conforming me to the values and perspectives of the eternal worship in heaven.  Where before I saw worship as expressive—expressing what is in my heart here and now, I now see worship as participatory—participating in the eternal heavenly worship.  I soon became aware that there were a lot references to the Trinity!  I stopped thinking about the Trinity and began to encounter the mystery of the Trinity.  One of the high points of early Christian worship is the Trisagion Hymn:

Holy God!  Holy Mighty!  Holy Immortal!  Have mercy on us.
Holy God!  Holy Mighty!  Holy Immortal!  Have mercy on us.
Holy God!  Holy Mighty!  Holy Immortal!  Have mercy on us.
 
Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit,
 now and ever and unto the ages of ages.  Amen.

 

After hearing this ancient hymn sung every Sunday for several years I stopped thinking of the Trinity as some complicated triangle diagram, or some syllogistic pretzel, but as a Mystery to be encountered in worship.  The Sunday worship in turn spills over into the prayer life of Orthodox Christians during the week.  Paul Evdokimov wrote:

It is not enough to say prayers; one must become, be prayer, prayer incarnate.  It is not enough to have moments of praise.  All of life, each act, every gesture, even the smile of the human face, must become a hymn of adoration, an offering, a prayer.

Many Orthodox Christians strive to follow a rule of prayer using the Morning Prayers and Evening Prayers.  I found that these fixed prayers offer structure and balance that I did not find in Evangelicalism’s spontaneous “from the heart” spiritual tradition.  I also discovered that these prayers have an eschatological aspect to them.  Prayer is eschatological because it makes us sharers in the kingdom of God.

 

Prayer as Journey

Lacets-12Prayer is a journey that takes us into the mystery of the Trinity.

A life of prayer will result in a transformed life.  This process of transformation is theosis (deification).

Jesus prayed:

 

And the glory which You gave Me I have given them, that they may be one just as We are one.  I in them, and You in Me; that they may be made perfect in one…. (John 17:22-23, OSB)

We are meant to be partakers of the divine glory shared by the Father and the Son.  We are called to be in the Son just as the Son is in the Father.  Thus, the Trinitarian structure of prayer reflects the basic purpose of prayer to draw us into the life of the Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

 Robert Arakaki

The Icon of Pentecost

 

images-34For me, the icon of Pentecost is one of the more intriguing and puzzling icons.

Unlike the lively emotionalism and expressiveness of Pentecostal worship, in this icon “nothing” seems to be happening.  But as I gaze at this icon, I gain insight into the Church’s understanding of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.  I used to be part of the charismatic renewal, so when I began to look into Orthodoxy I was surprised by the sobriety and the stillness of Orthodox spirituality.

 

The Spirit Descending

The Spirit Descending

The Spirit Descending

The Pentecost icon can be broken down into three sections.  At the top we see a half circle with rays emanating outward.  This represents the Holy Spirit descending from heaven.  This abstract depiction probably reflects a certain conservative streak in Slavic Orthodoxy that frowns on using a dove to represent the Holy Spirit.  Nowhere does Scripture teach that the Holy Spirit came down on Pentecost in the form of a dove.

The circle can be understood to represent the one divine Essence of the Holy Spirit and the rays extending outward as the uncreated energies filling the universe.  This simplicity with diversity is supported by Scripture like Luke’s narration of the Day of Pentecost in which the one Spirit is manifested in a multitude of flames.

Then there appeared to them divided tongues, as of fire, and one sat upon each of them.  And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. (Acts 2:2-4)

It is also supported by John’s Revelation.

Then I turned to see the voice that spoke with me.  And having turned I saw seven golden lampstands, and in the midst of the seven lampstands one like the Son of Man . . . . (Revelation 1:12-13)

Seven lamps of fire were burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God. (Revelation 4:5)

In Revelation’s rich visual language we see references to the Trinity.  Jesus stands before the throne of God the Father, and he stands in the midst of the seven lampstands which symbolize the Holy Spirit.  The number seven represents fullness and perfection.  It can also represent complementarity and diversity; Paul wrote in I Corinthians 12:6: “And there are diversities of activities, but it is the same God who works all in all.”

 

The Apostles Sitting

In the middle of the Pentecost icon we see the twelve Apostles sitting in a half circle in perfect harmony.  This reflects the historic Day of Pentecost.

When the Day of Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. (Acts 2:1)

pentecost

One important means of understanding an icon is to look at the posture taken by the main characters.  The Apostles sitting indicate their occupying a position of authority (Revelation 4:4).

 

 

Rublev's Holy Trinity Icon

Rublev’s Holy Trinity Icon

The twelve Apostles sitting in a half circle bears a resemblance to Rublev’s Holy Trinity icon where the three angelic visitors sit in a half circle around the dinner table in perfect fellowship.  This points to eternal life and to Pentecost’s connection to our deification in Christ.

The icon presents Pentecost, not so much as a historical event, but a spiritual reality that transcends history.  Pentecost was not a onetime event but is an ongoing reality flowing into human history.  As we reflect on the icon prayerfully we participate in the reality depicted by the Pentecost icon.

Divine grace was manifested in the God-Man Jesus Christ, but at Pentecost divine grace is manifested in the Church, the Body of Christ.  The Church is not a mere human organization, but a sacrament for the world.

 

The World Waiting

images-34At the bottom of the Pentecost icon we see a lonely figure named “Cosmos.”  This depicts the natural universe in its fallen state, in darkness, in isolation.  “Cosmos” is clothed in royal attire and has a crown on his head.  This teaches the dignity which God bestowed on creation at the beginning.  “Cosmos” holds a cloth with twelve scrolls representing the teachings of the Apostles.  This teaches the Great Commission, that is, Christ sending his Apostles to disciple the nations (Matthew 28:19-20).

The people who sat in darkness have seen a great light,
And upon those who sat in the region and shadow of death
Light has dawned. 
From that time Jesus began to preach and to say, 
“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”  
(Matthew 4:16-17)
 

The evangelization of the nations will lead in time to redemption of the entirety of the cosmos.  The Fall was a cosmic catastrophe.  The natural environment suffer the consequences of Adam and Eve’s rebellion against their Creator.  By the Incarnation, the Creator God entered into the cosmos acquiring materiality.  By his dying on the Cross Christ engaged the realities of sin and death, and by his Resurrection Christ defeated sin and death opening the way for the restoration of all things (Acts 3:21).  This is the basis for the Christian hope.  Paul wrote:

For the earnest expectation of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of God.  For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; because the creation itself will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. (Romans 8:19-21)

For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now.  Not only that, but we also who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body.  For we were saved in this hope, but hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one still hope for what he sees?  But if we hope for what we do not see, we eagerly wait for it with perseverance.  (Romans 8:22-25)

I would suggest that what unites both the Apostles and “Cosmos” is the theme of waiting.  Both the redeemed and those in darkness are yearning for redemption from death, sin, and futility.  Having heard the Good News, Christians have hope in the future resurrection, while those who have not yet heard the Good News of Christ are longing for something they know nothing of.  This inchoate yearning becomes an eager hope through faith in Christ.  It is for the Church to send out missionaries to proclaim the Good News into the spiritual darkness and confusion of our times.

Read from top to bottom, the Pentecost icon can be understood as Christ bestowing his Spirit on his Church.  It also teaches us about the Church’s mission to the world.  Returning to the middle it teaches us that our calling is eternal life in the Trinity and fellowship with one another.

 

Incarnation and Pentecost and the Trinity

In closing, Pentecost flows logically from the Incarnation.  Both are necessary for our salvation.  In the Incarnation the Son of God took from us human nature, and in Pentecost the Son of God gave to us his Spirit, the Third Person of the Trinity.  Jesus Christ went away on Ascension Thursday in order to prepare the way for Pentecost Sunday.  As Christians we become drinkers of the Spirit of God (John 4:10) and through faith in Christ we become part of the river of God.  Jesus promised:

If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink.  He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.   (John 7:37-38)

The icon of Pentecost is ultimately about our life in Christ and about our being joined to the Trinity.  Jesus prayed: “I in them, and You in Me; that they may be made perfect in one, and that the world may know that You have sent Me, and loved them as You have loved Me.” (John 17:23)  Let us be inspired by the Pentecost icon to live a life of unity and harmony with one another and with the Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Robert Arakaki

Rev. Uri Brito on Christ’s Bodily Ascension

 

Rev. Uri Brito

Rev. Uri Brito

Not too long ago I came across a fine blog posting by the Rev. Uri Brito on Christ’s bodily ascension to heaven.  While he and I come from different church traditions (Reformed versus Orthodox), there are some points in theology where we share common ground.  Reading Rev. Brito’s reflection reminded me of the debt I owe to the Reformed tradition: how it led me out of the shallows of Evangelicalism into the deeper waters of theology, doctrine, and the church fathers, and how the Reformed tradition (for me) pointed to the Orthodox Faith.    

When I was an Evangelical I rarely heard sermons or read expositions on Jesus’ ascension into heaven.  Pastor Brito apparently had the same kind of experience.  He writes:

The Ascension of Jesus is barely mentioned in the evangelical vocabulary. We make room for his birth, death, and resurrection, but we tend to put a period where God puts a comma.

This reflects the sad fact that for many Evangelicals the Incarnation plays a minor role in our salvation.  The focus of Evangelical soteriology is on Christ’s physical sufferings on the Cross.  This is rooted in the penal substitutionary theory that Christ offered up a pure and sinless offering on the Cross so that our sins would no longer be counted against us and that Christ’s righteousness would be imputed to those who believe in him.

Being rooted in the Reformed tradition Pastor Brito has a better grasp on the implications of the incarnation for our salvation.  He writes:

Our Lord is in his incarnation body at the right hand of the Father. This has all sorts of implications for us in worship. We are worshipping a God/Man; one who descended in human flesh and who ascended in human flesh. He is not a disembodied spirit. He is truly God and truly man.

The early Christians had a much broader understanding and deeper appreciation of the Incarnation of the eternal Word (Logos) for our salvation.  Athanasius in his classic work On the Incarnation wrote: “For He was made man that we might be made God.”  (54.3) Gregory of Nazianzen wrote: “For that which He [Christ] has not assumed He has not healed;  but that which is united to His Godhead is also saved.” (Epistle CI)  This understanding of salvation sees the Incarnation like a 360 degree circle in which the eternal Word descended from heaven, took on human nature, died on the Cross, descended in Hell, rose on the third day, then forty days later ascended to heaven to sit at the right hand of the Father.  This means that those who have joined themselves to Christ are positionally with him at the right hand of the Father wherein we enjoy the covenant benefits that belong to Christ by his divine sonship.

This understanding of the Incarnation and its connection to the Ascension represents a significant theological paradigm shift.  Evangelicalism has changed much in recent years, but back in the 1980s serious interest in the Incarnation for Evangelical theology was considered either on the cutting edge or out in left field.  I am grateful for the Reformed tradition teaching me about the early Church and expanding my theological understanding.

I remember one particular incident while I travelling with some Christian friends on the island of Kauai.  As we drove around the island I would from time to time entertain myself by reading the Heidelberg Catechism.

Q.  49. What benefits do we receive from Christ’s ascension into heaven?

A.  First, that he is our Advocate in the presence of his Father in heaven.  Second, that we have our flesh in heaven as a sure pledge that he, as the Head, will also take us, his members, up to himself.  Third, that he sends us his Spirit as a counterpledge by whose power we seek what is above, where Christ is, sitting at the right hand of God, and not things that are on earth. Heidelberg Catechism

I remember being startled when I read this strong affirmation of Christ’s taking on flesh for our salvation.  As an Evangelical I heard much about Christ’s birth and his death on the Cross.  I heard a little about Christ’s resurrection but almost nothing about the significance of his ascension for our salvation.  Reading this little gem in the Heidelberg Catechism, one of the major confessions of the Reformed tradition, helped me to appreciate the Incarnation as a long arc that included Christ’s birth, his death on the cross, his third day resurrection all of which culminates in his ascension to the Father.  It also challenged my understanding back then of heaven as strictly a spiritual place.  As I moved towards Orthodoxy I began to understand that in the Christian worldview both the heavenly and earthly realities interpenetrate each other.  This understanding is critical for a sacramental worldview.  [This is the introduction to an earlier post in 2012.]

 

ascension-pskov-pecheryFor readers who are wondering why I am posting this so many weeks after the original posting (8 May 2013), the reason is that on 13 June 2013 the Orthodox Church around the world will be celebrating Ascension Thursday.  The different calendars between the Eastern and Western church traditions are something Protestants converts to Orthodoxy have become accustomed to.  Nonetheless, it is worth noting that the Nicene Creed formulated by the First (Nicea 325) and Second (Constantinople 381) Ecumenical Councils unequivocally affirm the Incarnation and Christ’s bodily ascension to heaven.

For the Orthodox, Ascension Day is one of the major feast days of the Church.  They are expected to make an attempt to be at church.  For inquirers, attending a midweek service has the advantage of not getting lost in the crowd and seeing for one’s self how the Orthodox Church understands Christ ascension to heaven.  I encourage readers to contact a local Orthodox church and inquire about the time of their services.

Robert Arakaki

« Older posts Newer posts »