A Meeting Place for Evangelicals, Reformed, and Orthodox Christians

Author: Robert Arakaki (Page 20 of 89)

An Encounter with the Hawaiian Miraculous Icon

 

2012-0523-hawaii

Recently, there has been an increase in dialogue between Reformed Christians and Orthodox Christians about icons.  Much of it has been of an intellectual nature focused on the Bible and the early church fathers, but what is one to make of miraculous icons?  These pose a different kind of challenge to Christians who are accustomed to using logic and reason in theological debates.

I just received this from one of our readers, JM Burnham, who wrote of his encounter with miraculous icon in June 2016:

This past Sunday in my parish church, Holy Apostles (ROCOR) in Beltsville, Maryland, we had the distinct honor of welcoming the Hawaiian Iveron Myrrh-streaming Icon. As our dear Metropolitan Hilarion (First Hierarch of the Russian Church Abroad) was celebrating the Divine Liturgy, everyone came up to the Icons of the church-temple and venerated them. The myrrh-streaming Icon, which I named above, was actually streaming myrrh and giving off one of the loveliest odours of holiness I had ever witnessed; i.e., like roses mixed with a myriad of other odorous flowers, but a hundred times more fragrant and soothing.

Having said that, I have sadly encountered several [D]eformed Protestants who said that “It’s nothing more than Devil’s work! Satan’s deceiving you to get you to worship your idols and forget about Jesus!” Instead of taking it upon themselves to investigate further, I’ve noticed that such persons immediately dismiss any miracles in the Orthodox Church (let alone actively myrrh-streaming icons) as trickery from the Evil One. They then point their fingers at us Orthodox Christians saying that we’re guilty of idol worship and so many other “sins” against God. It is well-known that many Protestants, even some traditionalist Roman Catholics, don’t even believe that we Orthodox are actually Christians – but that’s a topic for another discussion.

The main point I’m trying to convey is anecdotal, yet strongly grounded in existential reality and interpersonal experience. For me, I felt confirmed in my faith as an Orthodox Christian. Seeing this miraculous icon actually helped me to realize some very important realities that I had been taking for granted, but not appreciating as deeply as I ought:

Icons are not “idolatrous pictures of dead saints,” as most mainline Protestants would call them. These sacred “pictures” amplify, and bring home the reality of, the Incarnation of the God-man, Jesus Christ. In particular, myrrh-streaming icons, such as the Hawaiian Iveron Icon as aforementioned, demonstrate the approval of the Holy Spirit, for it is only the Holy Spirit Who could bring about such secular-logic-defying, clearly supernatural occurrences. It is almost always (about 95% of the time) Icons of the Theotokos that tend to be miraculous. This demonstrates Mary’s critical role in God the Word’s [historical] Incarnation as well as the incarnational reality of the Church, Christ’s Mystical Body; after all, the Church Fathers looked upon Mary as the purest figure of the Church. Moreover, after venerating the myrrh-streaming icon, I realized in a more profound way that the Orthodox Church truly is the Body of Christ, in both time and eternity, in heaven and on earth, against which “the gates of hell shall [have] not prevail[ed]” (Matthew 16:18).

I just wanted to share this little story with everyone to help bring home the profoundly simple truth of the Orthodox Faith concerning Icons. As a side note, I’m a recovering Roman Catholic, and I sometimes still struggle with some of the negatives effects that Roman Catholic heresy has had upon my heart, mind, body, and soul. Such miraculous icons can only be witnessed in canonical Orthodox Churches. They do NOT exist in the Roman Catholic church or in the Protestant communities; moreover, they definitely do not exist in any other religious expression (non-Christian) known to mankind. Orthodoxy is indeed unique; it is deeply supernatural and a living Faith that has no equals.

 

Comment from Robert

Oily streaks on the glass cover of the Hawaii icon.

Oily streaks on the glass cover of the Hawaii icon.

I know this icon.  Living in Hawaii, I visit the Russian Orthodox Church often and most of the time I will see this icon on the stand up in front.  The icon is what I would call a quiet miracle.  When I stand before it, I can see oily streaks on the glass cover and smell the flowery fragrance emanating from the icon.  The first time I saw the icon I was surprised by the absence of drama.  Yet, as I stood before it, I found myself amazed at this inexplicable phenomenon.  It was as if God opened this window to heaven just a tiny bit, allowing the fragrant scent of heaven to flow over into our fallen world that is so desperately in need of His mercy.

There are stories of people being healed miraculously after being anointed by the oil coming from this icon.  But then, there are many who have not been healed after seeing this icon.  These healing miracles are a gift from God, but they are not the main point.  With respect to miracles, Orthodoxy is not cessationist.  (Cessationaism is the heresy that miracles ceased with the death of the last of the original Apostles.)  We believe that miracles can happen, even today.  The main point of Orthodox icons is to draw us closer to Christ.  When I stand before the miraculous Iveron icon, I see the Virgin Mary pointing her hand to Jesus.  I am reminded of her total commitment to her Son and our God.  I reflect on her words: “Whatever He says to you, do it.” (John 2:5)

I would not advocate using miraculous icons as a means of refuting the Reformed tradition’s iconoclasm. The better approach is to appeal to Scripture and the witness of the church fathers.  Nonetheless, the miraculous Hawaiian icon does pose a challenge to the secular, disenchanted worldview so prevalent among Reformed and Evangelical Christians.  Fr. Stephen Freeman described this particular outlook in his recent post “The Disenchanted World”:

Where people of earlier eras and other cultures have experienced the world around them as charged with divine power (of various sorts), we simply experience the world as inert. There is nothing there.

Secularism has affected, not just the way Protestants view nature, but also the way they approach conversion.  The Protestant reduction of the Gospel to mere “rational choice” avoids, if not obviates, conversion being a super-natural work of the Holy Spirit. The empirical nature of this miraculous icon cannot be refuted by means of logic and syllogism.

 

Screen Shot 2016-07-28 at 3.49.58 PMReader Nectarios Yangson who is tasked with guarding the icon noted:

It is the grace of the Holy Spirit visibly showing itself upon us.  It is something tangible: we can touch; we can taste; we can feel.  [See “Icon of Unity” at 7:25]

An encounter with the Hawaiian miraculous icon and others like it – Yes, there are other miraculous icons! – is like a short visit to the enchanted world of the kingdom of God suffused with the divine presence.

In the Bible, visible tangible miracles are often used to validate a spiritual claim.  In Mark’s Gospel Jesus prefaced the healing of the paralytic with: “But that you may know . . . .” (Mark 2:10)  The beneficiaries of the healing miracle were not just the paralytic lying on the pallet, but also the Pharisees and teachers of the Law who doubted Jesus’ authority to forgive sins.  Not all miracles are from God; therefore, miracles need to be subjected to spiritual tests, e.g., Is Jesus Christ glorified?  Is his coming in the flesh affirmed?  Is the Church, the Body of Christ, edified?  Are sinners converted?  The atmosphere surrounding a miraculous icon should be a faith-filled one like in Luke 5:26: “And they were all amazed, and they glorified God and were filled with fear, saying, ‘We have seen strange things today!’”

Venerating the miraculous icon

Venerating the miraculous icon

 

Miraculous icons also serve as notice to prospective converts that conversion to Orthodoxy entails more than an intellectual acceptance of the Seventh Ecumenical Council and the writings of early church fathers like John of Damascus and Theodore the Studite.  It involves a transition from a detached, intellectual approach to Christianity to one of an embodied mysticism that is sensuous and otherworldly at the same time.  One does not gawk at a miraculous icon.  The Orthodox response to this miraculous icon is one of veneration mixed with love and affection.  We gather at church; we sing hymns honoring Mary; we ask Mary to be our prayer partner to Christ; and we line up to kiss her icon.  This is what the Seventh Ecumenical Council had in mind when they affirmed the veneration of icons.  One way to venerate the Hawaii Iveron icon is to kiss Mary’s hand which points to her Son and then to kiss Christ’s feet.  In honoring the mother we honor her Son, and in honoring our God Jesus Christ we honor his mother Mary who made possible the miracle of the Incarnation.

A friend once expressed disappointment that she had missed seeing the miraculous icon.  I pointed out that all icons are special, and, that this miraculous is not more sacred than the others.  It is just that God chose to use this particular icon to manifest his grace in a visible, tangible way to weak, sinful people like us.  With the other “ordinary” icons God’s grace is invisible; we respond to this unseen grace through an act of faith.  This means we don’t have wait for a miraculous icon to come to our neighborhood.  Just go to the nearest Orthodox parish!

In closing, the miraculous Hawaii icon is a sign that the kingdom of God has come near, that we need to repent and turn to God.  This call to repentance applies to the Orthodox just as it does to Reformed and Evangelical Christians.  So if the Hawaiian miraculous icon does come to your area, don’t hesitate to visit the icon.  It is God’s gift of mercy to Orthodox and non-Orthodox.  As Philip said in response to Nathaniel’s skepticism: “Come and see!

Robert Arakaki

 

RESOURCES

Article: “Iveron Icon of the Blessed Virgin Mary Visits Our Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church.”

Video: “Icon of Unity – The Hawaiian Myrrh-Streaming Icon of the Mother of God.”   [Reader Nectarios at 7:25]

Video: NECN News Report “exuding’ icon draws thousands to Massachusetts.

Video: “Opening Hawaii Icon

Article:The Disenchanted World.”  Fr. Stephen Freeman.  Glory to God for All Things, 22 July 2016.

 

 

An Invitation

Dear Folks,

I received this message from Tudor Petcu, a graduate of the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Romania.

Tudor-Petcu-2-150x150My name is Tudor Petcu, I am a Romaniam writer and I want to post my message here because I wish to invite anyone of you who have chosen the conversion to Orthodoxy to give me his testimony. I am working on a book which contains testiomonies from different Westerns converted to the Orthodox Church, that’s why I invite you to become a part of my project. I also have to mention the the book (first volume) will be published by the end of this year.
For some more information about my book and the interview, please contact me via email: petcutudor86@gmail.com I would be very delighted to make contact with more and more Westerns converted to Orthodoxy because everyone’s story is very charming.

I’m guessing that there are a few readers out there who have made the decision to convert to Orthodoxy.  If you want to share your story how you became Orthodox, this looks like a good opportunity.

Those desiring more information about Tudor Petcu and his ministry should read his recent article “Orthodoxy and Philosophy: An Interview with Travis Dumsday” in Journey to Orthodoxy and the website studia humana.

Robert Arakaki

Book Review: Re-Introducing Christianity

 

29856317._UY200_

Orthodox Apologetics for the 21st Century

Christian apologetics involves two tasks: (1) presenting the Good News of Christ in a way understandable to the audience at hand and (2) defending the Good News of Christ in a way that addresses the questions and objections that listeners may have.  Apologetics involves a high level of communication.  It is not a form of debate, but rather an attempt to speak to the listener’s intellectual questions, social context, and existential concerns.  Doing it well calls for the ability to adapt one’s presentation of the message to one’s audience.  When addressing the Jews, the Apostle Paul cited the Torah, but when he spoke to the Greek philosophers in Athens, he quoted from the poet Aratus’ work, Phaenomena.

An overview of Christian apologetics reveals diversity in style and approaches.  In the early Church, there was a group, known as Apologists, whose goal was to: (1) present Jesus as the promised Messiah to Jews; (2) commend the Gospel to polytheistic Greeks and Romans; and (3) defend Christians against accusations brought against them before the Roman government.  Among the early apologetics works are Epistle to Diognetus, Athenagoras’ Plea, Justin Martyr’s Dialogue with Trypho, and Tertullian’s The Apology.

Protestant apologetics range from the rationalistic presuppositional apologetics of Cornelius Van Til and Francis Schaeffer, to the forensic, evidential approach favored by Josh McDowell’s well known Evidence That Demands a Verdict.

Some of the best Christian apologetics can be found in Roman Catholics like G.K. Chesterton, whose paradoxical one-liners give the reader an inverted view of reality that often leads to spiritual enlightenment, or Anglicans like C.S. Lewis whose apologetics style combines reason with imagination.  (See Louis A. Markos’ “Literary Apologetics.”)

The book Re-Inventing Christianity points to a new kind of Orthodox apologetics.  Up till now some of best Orthodox apologetics were written to a Christian audience or to an audience familiar with the Christian religion, e.g., Timothy Ware’s The Orthodox Church.  While undoubtedly a classic, many readers found the book difficult to understand.  Part of the problem lies with the ornate prose style favored by British academics.  Peter Gillquist’s Becoming Orthodox and Matthew Gallatin’s Searching for God in a Land of Shallow Wells are written in a style more familiar to American Evangelicals.  However as American society becomes increasingly post-Christian, a new kind of apologetics is needed that speaks to a mixed audience that is both Christian and post-Christian.

Re-Introducing Christianity: An Eastern Apologia for a Western Audience was published by Wipf and Stock in the spring of 2016.  The book attempts to speak to a diverse twenty-first century audience that ranges from devout Protestants to disenchanted post-Evangelicals to post-Christian Nones.  Under the Amir Azarvan’s editorial leadership, some twenty authors of diverse backgrounds contributed chapters on Orthodoxy (including this writer). The contributors were instructed to make their contributions short and readable.  Many of the chapters are brief but packed with information.  Below are some of the book’s highlights.  I have grouped them along the lines of different apologetics tasks.

I. Basic Questions About God and About Jesus

  • Fr. Jonathan Tobias’ chapter, “The Reality of God,” sketches how Cartesian dualism has influenced our understanding of modern science in a way that excludes the reality of God and how quantum mechanics’ refutation of the observer/observed dichotomy provides an alternative understanding of reality that is open to the reality of God.
  • Many nowadays have grown up in a post-Christian society where bizarre ideas about Jesus are being circulated in the popular media.  Although clearly fictional, Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code has popularized many of these ideas.  Eugenia Constantinou’s chapter, “The Historical Jesus,” addresses some of the basic questions post-Christians might have about Jesus: (1) Did Jesus even exist? (2) What happened during the “lost years” of his childhood?, and (3) Was Jesus married?

II. Protestant Questions About Orthodoxy

  • Protestants interested in Orthodoxy will be interested in Fr. John Whiteford’s chapter, “Bible Only?,” in which he critically examines one of the core beliefs of Protestantism.
  • Fr. Steven Ritter examines another of Protestantism’s key teachings in “Are We Saved by Faith Alone?”  On a closely related topic is eternal security which is scrutinized by Joshua Packwood in “Once Saved, Always Saved?”
  • Protestants concerned about the Orthodox veneration of icons will want to read my chapter, “Are We Violating the Second Commandment? The Orthodox Teaching on Icons.”  I’ve already written extensively on this subject matter on the OrthodoxBridge.  This short chapter – only four pages – condenses the main points of my apologia for icons.
  • Many Protestants and their churches eschew “scripted” prayer for spontaneous prayer that “comes from the heart.”  They assume this is the normal way Christians pray. Deacon Michael Bressem chapter, “Why We Recite ‘Scripted’ Prayers,” brings to light the surprising fact that this way of praying is relatively new and can be traced back to the English Puritans of the 1600s.  His excerpt of John Bunyan’s diatribe against liturgical prayer is eye opening.

III. Hard Questions About the Orthodox Church

  • Many Westerners today having become disenchanted with the prevailing rationalism of mainstream culture are turning East in their quest for an experiential and mystical pathway to Reality.  Kyriacos Markides in “The Three-Fold Way” describes the Orthodox teaching of the healing and restoration of the soul to its original divine state via askesis.
  • As Orthodoxy’s presence in America grows, people will form initial impressions which often lead to hard questions that must be answered.  One impression is that Orthodoxy seems ethno-centric.  Fr. Ernesto Obregon addresses this concern in “Is Orthodoxy an Ethnically Exclusive Religion?”  Another issue is Orthodoxy’s all male priesthood which is addressed in Sister Margarete Roeber’s chapter “Respect for Women and the Tradition of the Male Priesthood.”

 

Post-Christian America -- Methodist Church Converted into Restaurant

Post-Christian America — Methodist Church Converted into Restaurant  source

 

Speaking to Twenty-First Century America

The future prospects for Orthodoxy’s growth in a post-Christian America depends on its members being able to being able to explain to their family members, friends, colleagues, and even passing acquaintances what Orthodoxy is and the reasons why they are Orthodox Christians.  Much will also depend on the spirit in which Orthodox outreach is done.  Orthodox apologetics at its best is not combative, but conversational.  Amir Arzavan wrote in his introductory chapter:

…our goal is to communicate in an honest, yet non-adversarial way, the following message to the reader: “Here is why we invite you to explore the faith that has brought us so much hope and joy.” (p. 9)

 

Recommendation

Re-Introducing Christianity is a book that speaks to the rapidly changing religious landscape of twenty-first century America.  I recommend it for the following audiences:

  • Seekers looking for a more authentic Christianity different from the many modern offshoots that populate the religious marketplace these days,
  • Christians and non-Christians seeking reasonable answers to contemporary critiques of the Christian religion, and
  • Orthodox Christians who want to commend Orthodox Christianity is to their friends and family in these troubled and tumultuous times.

Robert Arakaki

Copies may be ordered from Amazon or Wipf and Stock Publishers.

« Older posts Newer posts »